On 27/2/23 03:34, David Laehnemann wrote:
Hi Chris, hi Sean,
Hiya!
thanks also (and thanks again) for chiming in.
No worries.
Quick follow-up question: Would `squeue` be a better fall-back command than `scontrol` from the perspective of keeping `slurmctld` responsive?
Sadly not, whilst a site can do some tricks to enforce rate limiting on squeue via the cli_filter that doesn't mean others have that set up, so they are vulnerable to the same issue.
Also, just as a quick heads-up: I am documenting your input by linking to the mailing list archives, I hope that's alright for you? https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake/pull/2136#issuecomment-1446170467
No problem - but I would say it's got to be sacct. All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Berkeley, CA, USA
