>From what I'm reading in the man pages, it seems like PreempExemptTime isn't >compatible with suspending jobs instead of requeue/cancelling them, no matter >if at the partition or qos level. Am I reading that correctly? We currently >give users the option of submitting to a partition that lets their job be >suspended, or to one where they're requeued. Do we have to give that up to >offer a min run time on jobs (for just one partition/qos)?
Rob ________________________________ From: slurm-users <slurm-users-boun...@lists.schedmd.com> on behalf of Christopher Samuel <ch...@csamuel.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:40 PM To: slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com <slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> Subject: Re: [slurm-users] PreemptExemptTime On 3/7/23 6:46 am, Groner, Rob wrote: > Over global settings are PreemptMode=SUSPEND,GANG and > PreemptType=preempt/partition_prio. We have a high priority partition > that nothing should ever preempt, and an open partition that is always > preemptable. In between is a burst partition. It can be preempted if > the high priority partition needs the resources. That's the partition > we'd like to guarantee a 1 hour run time on. Looking at the sacctmgr > man page, it gives this info on QOS Just a quick comment, here you're talking about both partitions and QOS's with respect to preemption, I think for this you need to pick just one of those options and only use those configs. For instance we just use QOS's for preemption and our exempt time works in that case. Hope this helps! All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.csamuel.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Crug262%40psu.edu%7C0ed8f546e70843e7266208db1f4c5471%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C0%7C638138184919726959%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=md1MaA%2FIj%2Fb%2B27e7JLkVwSY5IUSVnsJIdx6PADl0JF4%3D&reserved=0 : Berkeley, CA, USA
