|
Hi Folks, I have a couple of AirNic/AirPoint
units in various configurations under test, and they are working fine. Now we want to look at the hardware that
should be used for point-to-point. We
are having arguments here about what the correct hardware configuration should
be. I’ve been trying to act
as a referee but have to admit that my knowledge is a bit lacking – so HELP!!!! CAMP-1: At
location-A use an AirPoint with an omni as the
local. Then connect a second AirPoint via LAN cable and put a directional antenna on the
AirPoint to communicate with a mirror system at
location-B. This does work, and I
suppose that is the important thing. CAMP-2: This
group says that AirBridges should be used instead of AirPoints for the Point-To-Point link. Howeverm they
cannot explain why the AirBridge should be better. Anyone out there got any ideas. My lazy option is to stick with the AirPoints because we have a load of spare AirPoints, but if the AirBridge
has advantages, then I am willing to have my arm
twisted!!! Oliver Leamy Ogenek Teoranta, Ballingeary, Macroom +353 (26) 47808 ; +353 (86)
8337664 |
- RE: [smartBridges] A Bridge Too Far? Oliver Leamy
- RE: [smartBridges] A Bridge Too Far? Jason
- Re: [smartBridges] A Bridge Too Far? Marlon Schafer \(509-982-2181\)
- RE: [smartBridges] A Bridge Too F... Eric Calkins
- Re: [smartBridges] A Bridge T... Marlon Schafer \(509-982-2181\)
- Re: [smartBridges] A Bridge T... Marlon Schafer \(509-982-2181\)
- RE: [smartBridges] A Bridge Too Far? phantam
- RE: [smartBridges] A Bridge Too F... Eric Calkins
- Re: [smartBridges] A Bridge T... Marlon Schafer \(509-982-2181\)
- RE: [smartBridges] A Brid... David Blood
- Re: [smartBridges] A... Marlon Schafer \(509-982-2181\)
