If you are connecting two medical offices together you should use a VPN
connection. This will provide an infinitely higher level of encryption if
configured properly.
Lewis

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patti Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] medical security


> Yes, but what I want to know is if I turn on WEP from the handheld to my
> tower does that cover that leg.  Then it comes into my POP and then is
sent
> back to the main office over our existing T1 to their server how would
you
> encrypt that portion or could you?  Also, everyone keeps telling me WEP
is
> nothing anyway since it can be hacked easily.
>
> Patti
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bobby Bounds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 7:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] medical security
>
>
> As has been stated in an earlier post, the (HIPAA, legal) security
burden is
> on the health care organization(s).....NOT the carrier.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Scott Damron
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 5:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] medical security
>
> You really Nailed that one!!!  Hippa is open to interpretation, you need
> to be EXTREAMLY CAREFUL when dealing with it.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RFMS
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] medical security
>
>
> You are being kind. Recent legislation has not only raised the bar, it
> has imposed necessary restraints and safety points for those that have
> this information.
>
> In short, from the point of demarc, like your Palm Pilot, your Compaq IQ
> or whatever, it must be encrypted, to the final point of reception. Then
> it may be decrypted and used for the intended purpose. Standards are in
> place to determine these levels, so
> please go read them.
>
> It is not the bandwidth provider's problem to provide security for the
> user's network, but it does appear that existing laws are requiring the
> bandwidth provider at the very least, be able to provide a circuit that
> will allow the minimal amount of encryption PTP required by law.  This
> is meant to say, your network will pass at least 3DES or hopefully 56DES
> encrypted data end to end.
>
> In other words, if your security does not meet HIPPA standards, then it
> is very likely you will have to answer a lot of questions when the time
> arrives for the medical institution to describe "HOW" and "WHO" is
> providing the connections to the various medical facilities they work
> with.
>
> Beware of those that don't really know what they are talking
> about: particularly a Doctor or his Secretary.
>
> Having done this, been there and have a case of T-shirts un-worn yet,
> for this type of situation to show for it, I am just saying a person
> should be knowledgeable or very cautious when making decisions that
> concern records of Individual Privacy.
>
> R
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Brendan O'Bra
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] medical security
>
>
> You might want to at least check out HIPAA - http://www.hipaa.org/
>
> Recent legislation has raised the bar on this a bit.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patti Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:34 PM
> Subject: [smartBridges] medical security
>
>
> > Is anyone using wireless to allow hospitals to transmit data to and
> > from remote locations via your network?  Or perhaps the visiting
> > nurses association to have the nurses upload the data from the car
> > when they
> finish
> > a home visit?  I know the security involved would be considerable and
> > wondered if anyone else was doing this?
> >
> >
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in
> the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://198.63.203.6
>

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://198.63.203.6  

Reply via email to