Would you say this just affects the clients or the ap too in your opinion? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:00 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] RSSI max?
> > We've actually seen radios with sporadic association and get > lower throughput because the RSSI was pegged at 100%. (actually > we think it was getting more than 100%) We put a smaller antenna > on the radio to get the RSSI down in the low 90s and throughput > went from about 400Kbps to 2.1Megabit. > > Kevin Summers > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > www.kistech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nish Park > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] RSSI max? > > > You need not do anything special to lower the RSSI. It will not saturate the > radio. > > Nish > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jerry Carter > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:06 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [smartBridges] RSSI max? > > Ok if your clients all(or some) have 90-100% Rssi on the AP is that going to > overload the ap? Should you try to lower it to say 70-80 and get everyone at > that? Or is it always more is better? Or what about repeter to ap? > > Jerry > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
