That's what I'm hearing, and that's exactly what I need.
Since it's a feature of the AirPointPro and not the AirPoint
I'll have to upgrade to find out what it all looks like. :-)

Kevin Summers
KISTech Internet Services Inc.
www.kistech.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Which signal to read?
>
>
> Now I'm confused...
>
> My understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) is that I look
> at the CPE
> (ABO) simple monitor to tell me how well it "hears" the Access
> Point (APPO).
> Right?
>
> I look at the Access Point (APPO) simple monitor to tell me how well it
> "hears" the CPE (ABO). Right?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sB Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:30 PM
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Which signal to read?
>
>
> > That is correct. The AP shows the Received Signal Strength for a client
> > in the client table based on traffic traverse. It doesn't poll the
> > client to get it from client. It is the local value, though they
> > represent airBridge values. The RSSI shown at the AP or Client CPE will
> > never be the same due to wireless medium behavior. Also at different
> > time, you will see different value because the packet can travel at
> > different way than before, so the RSSI value is just an indication only.
> >
> >
> > Alex
> > sB Tech Support
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Garrett
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:54 AM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Which signal to read?
> >
> > The readings are totally separate. The AP is generally  not able to hear
> >
> > the client as well because the client end is lower powered , lower
> > elevation and  the AP sees many radios out there so the noise level is
> > higher. RSSI is a crunched number including noise, interference, and
> > atmospherics. This is half duplex, and each way is a different
> > transmitter talking to a different receiver, but not at the same time.
> > Don't forget there may be multipath cancellation one direction and not
> > the other.
> > In short, the client hears the tower well but the tower can not hear the
> >
> > client so well. Do the path calculation for fade margin both directions.
> >
> > If either one comes out poor the link will be marginal.
> >
> > Jerry Carter wrote:
> >
> > > But the airbridge has the higher reading.(better than the ap shows). I
> >
> > > dont get it. So you do not really go by one or the other?
> > >
> > >     ----- Original Message -----
> > >     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >     To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >     Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:40 PM
> > >     Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Which signal to read?
> > >
> > >     That's exactly spot on! :) looks like the access point doesn't
> > >     hear the airbridge very well. This may result in a slower  than
> > >     desirable upload speed.
> > >
> > >     What you want to do is get the access point to hear all your
> > >     clients at about the same RSSI.. it's not so critical if the
> > >     airbridge sees the ap at a lower RSSI.
> > >
> > >     cheers,
> > >     Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >     -----
> > >     Paul C. Murdock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >     mobile/801.864.1024 - fax/801.446.0130
> > >     www.paulmurdock.com - for more info
> > >
> > >         -----Original Message-----
> > >         From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >         [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > >         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >         Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:30 PM
> > >         To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >         Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Which signal to read?
> > >
> > >         My guess is that both are correct, keeping in mind how RF
> > >         really works.
> > >
> > >         One radio is reporting what it sees and hears while the other
> > >         radio is reporting what it sees and hears. Only in ideal
> > >         situations would you see the same exact numbers on both ends.
> > >
> > >         Just my humble opinion, but I could be wrong...
> > >
> > >         Michael
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >             ----- Original Message -----
> > >             From: Jerry Carter <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >             To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >             <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >             Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:15 PM
> > >             Subject: [smartBridges] Which signal to read?
> > >
> > >             I have all smartbridge network. I check the signal at the
> > >             appo and it says 52% rssi and 85 Quality. I log into the
> > >             airbridge and it tells me it has a 82% RSSI and a 92%
> > >             Quality. Now I would rather believe the airbridge. But I
> > >             need to know for sure which one to look at when
> > installing.
> > >
> > >             Jerry
> > >
> >
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> unsubscribe smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to