If you have a NATed network. You have private IP address's on each client.
These address's are NEVER seen on the actual internet. They are a network,
in effect, seperate from the internet.  The box that does your NAT, your
router, or software, usally has a PAT IP.  Whats called a Port Address
Translation Address.    Its translates your internal clients to this ONE pat
IP for the rest of the world.

So, lets say you had 200 people on your internal network.  From the
internet, all the access would look as if it was coming from that PAT port
on your router.  The router keeps all the data going to the right places,
but going into that requires more knowledge of TCP/IP that I'm not going to
go into now, but it only goes to one acutal internet IP.  The rest of the
world only sees that one IP.


Dennis


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 12:03 AM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] DHCP vs static


> Eje
> Can you explain more.
> I'm not a network guy, I think you know that already, others do that
around
> here.
> Are you saying when my subs go to certain sites or use their kazaa that
the
> single public ip addy is displayed and not their private ip addy that I
> assign them?
> George
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Eje Gustafsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 9:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] DHCP vs static
>
>
> > But if you get a public ip that is your masquerading machines IP you
> > can not tell what client was causing that traffic 5 days ago. You
> > would have to catch them "in the act" to determin what client that
> > traffic originates from.... However I see possible lawsuits happen
> > when you do it that way. Because all a sudden your not only the
> > carrier your also the "anonymizer".
> >
> > Best regards,
> >  Eje Gustafsson                       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The Family Entertainment Network      http://www.fament.com
> > Phone : 620-231-7777                  Fax   : 620-231-4066
> >      - Your Full Time Professionals -
> > Mikrotik OEM - Online Store http://www.fament.com/catalog/
> > -- 
> > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive.
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/
> > --
> > G> But why wouldn't you have that information?
> > G> Are you running NAT and DHCP so that each time a client turns on he
> gets a
> > G> different IP addy?
> > G> I run NAT on a lot of my micro pops and use static IP's. I know each
of
> my
> > G> subs IP addresses public or private.
> > G> George
> >
> > G> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > G> From: "Jerry Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > G> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > G> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 8:53 PM
> > G> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] DHCP vs static
> >
> >
> > >> What if you run NAT and do not have the information?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 10:52 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] DHCP vs static
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > And that's what they will do. Ask Verizon. They fought it, and a
> federal
> > >> > court of appeals upheld that they had to turn over the names of who
> had
> > >> > what ip when, so that the RIAA could go after them.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Tim Harris wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hey!  The only way anyone outside of my organization gets any IP
> > >> information
> > >> > > regarding who has what IP address is with a SUBPOENA!
> > >> >
> > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > >> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
unsubscribe
> > >> smartBridges)
> > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > >> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > G> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > >> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> > G> smartBridges)
> > >> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > >>
> >
> > G> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > G> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > G> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > G> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> > -- 
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to