|
REPLY
INLINE
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 9:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. well you may be correct on that answer I do notice
that when I am at the client side pings suck but on the noc side pings to the
radio are good which I assume is because I have more power going to then them
coming in?? But their RSSI and link are always high! yet different between what
the APPO reports and what the client radio reports which the client side always
shows MORE.
TEH> The client side should almost always see the AP
at a stronger signal than the AP can see the client. Does the AP indicate a
RSSI/LQ lower than 60%? A lower RSSI on the AP indicates that the clients
antenna may be ineffective. You may try increasing the gain of the clients
antenna. Try pinging an idle computer while there is heavy traffic. If the
results are good, then the AP is handeling the load fine and the client is
having problems (antenna gain).
I tried pinging beyond the radio to the ip on the
client pc if it is not being blocked by a firewall etc and pings are still
crappy especially if they are surfing. What do you mean a TCP packet throughput
test???
What's also funny is I changed one APPO SSID
to a completely different one and did not change the clients to match yet 4
ABO's still connected to the APPO and were still passing traffic, this threw me
off because at first I thought someone was leaching my line HEHEHE but it was my
own people. Any reason WHY this would still allow customers to associate??
TEH> A TCP packet test is anything that you can transfer that
uses TCP/IP like an HTTP or FTP download. TCP (http, ftp) is more
important that ICMP (ping) or UDP (tftp,
snmp) and the radios MAY (I don't know) discard them if they don't have the
time. If the radios in question have an ESSID (name of AP to associate with) of
ANY then they will associate with anything. If they are set to a specific name
then it could be a bug.
|
Title: Message
- [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Blazen Wireless
- RE: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Scott Damron
- RE: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Tom Haynes
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Blazen Wireless
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Tom Haynes
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Blazen Wireless
- RE: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations... Tom Haynes
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrat... Blazen Wireless
- RE: [smartBridges] APPO furs... Tom Haynes
- RE: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Colorado Wisp
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Blazen Wireless
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Eje Gustafsson
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Blazen Wireless
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. craig
- Re: [smartBridges] APPO furstrations.. Blazen Wireless
