I wonder why if he is on channel 1 and you are on channel 11 you would have these problems?
Anyone have any helpfull insight?
George



Dave Covert wrote:


Man, this stuff just doesn't play well with others does it?

I just spent the evening risking West Nile virus exposure in the middle of a
marina with my laptop hooked up to an aBO trying to get more than 200K back
to my tower .7 miles away. The marina is infested with an incumbent WISP on
ch.1 using Linksys equipment and an omni (to cover 180* of marina, duh).
During the middle of the day, with the marina empty of ch.1 users, my client
on ch.11 gets well over 2Mbps. As more of the ch.1 users start to arrive
home and use the ch.1 system, my user on ch.11 sees a slowdown as well.

My client is using an 18bdi Maxrad panel to talk to my 16dbi sector less
than a mile away. I know the 18dbi panel is overkill signal-wise, but my POP
is in the same general direction as the ch.1 POP and I am using the 18dbi
more for the confined beam angle than for the overall gain.

I guess this is more of a rant than anything else... I just don't get how
these devices (11b in general, not sB in particular) have so poor rejection
as to allow ch.1 traffic to bleed over into ch.11 traffic. Anyone know a
good super-narrow bandpass filter design? I would love to have an inline
channel filter I could put on the antenna connector to knock down the
out-of-channel energy another 25db or so.

Guess I'll go turn my antennas sideways and see if that helps... grumble
grumble...

Dave
Home Wireless

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org




The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

Reply via email to