Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate

[Blazen Wireless]

I have been using this software called SERVERS ALIVE its free and lets you ping up to 10 servers and if you want to ping more up to 1000 IP's then you buy the license key for $100 it has tons of cool things you can set up with it, remote reboots of servers etc etc..   http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/     ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Summers To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:20 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate What are you using for paging? I've been looking for a good solution for that... Kevin Summers KISTech Internet Services Inc. www.kistech.com   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate Mine pages me too I got tired of all the pages so I shut that off!     ----- Original Message ----- From: The Wirefree Network To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:06 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate Now isn�t this a bit TOOOOOO coincidental?!?!? I mentioned 10:20 am on mine.  However, that is when IPCheck paged me to tell me.  When I checked my log, it actually went down at 10:15.30 Pacific Standard Time.   Anyone else go down at the same time???   Sully   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate   I mentioned at around 9-10:30am that a few went offline I can check my logs from today I think they both crapped out at about 10:15 today.. Here ar my logs sorry it was soo long but you can see the times quite clearly when the 10.0.0.98 unit went down and it is still down no moatter how many times I try to ping it or reboot the APPO it is supposed to associate to.. it was good all night then at around 10:14PT 10.0.0.98 it went down   Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 52.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 44ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 64.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 32ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:11 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:12 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with a successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 27.5ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:12 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:04 AM Check cycle starts ( 0- 1) Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 46ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 40ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 44.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 48ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:20 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:25 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Check cycle starts ( 1- 2) Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 46.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:27 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 28ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:32 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:33 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with a successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 30ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:33 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Check cycle starts ( 2- 3) Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a success of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 48.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 52.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:46 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:49 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:50 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 60.3ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 32ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 24ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:58 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed due to a successrate of only 0% ----- Original Message ----- From: The Wirefree Network To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:20 PM Subject: RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate   A common factor keeps coming up here�.the 1000 hr.  Hmmm�.mine went down this morning at 10:20 am.  Yesterday it went down at 9:45 am.  The day before at 10:05 am.   Hmmmmm�..I seem to remember other folks mentioning the same time frame.   Like I said earlier�this may not be an overall temperature exceeding a certain threshold thing�it may be a temperature SWING thing.  In other words, maybe when the unit goes from 70 degrees to 80 degrees in just 15 minutes, it craps??  I don�t know�but this is very odd.   I can say this though�.my network has very little traffic at 10:00 am.   Sully   P.S.  I powered it down for 10 minutes and it has been working fine since.  So�if it was an overall temperature thing�then why does it stay up for the rest of the day, with it getting even hotter???  This is where I would focus, if I were an sB engineer!!   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Bounds Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate   I replaced a 2 week old APPO last night that was exhibiting the "lost association" problem. The new APPO I used as the replacement came from the same order I got from Electro-Comm. This new unit worked sporadically last night but this morning around 10 am lost all signs of life.   Also we purchased 3 ABO's during the same time frame. One died completely and the other two are disassociating every evening about the same time.   So, were ohhh for five on those 'June' units.   Bobby Bounds Airwave Internet, LLC