Hi Rudolph,
If it is a single point to point link using XO series then it is advisable to do bandwidth throttling at only one end, either CPE or AP end, if the bandwidth throttling is done at the CPE end it will be able to manage all the throttling for the PC's connected behind it. If it is a point to multipoint link, with XO series in CB mode at a few customers location, then it is better to do the throttling at the main AP, the reason being if you decide to do at the CPE end, using XO then you have make sure all the other CPE units should also have bandwidth throttling capabilities and then disable bandwidth throttling at the main AP. This ensures bandwidth throttling is done only at one end. Regards, Vasu -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rudolph Worrell Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 12:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Slow down problems Vasu, If the XO is the AP in CB mode feeding to the main AP will it be able to manage all the throttling? -- Rudolph Worrell President Phone:(540)664-3950 Fax:(270)458-6431 www.wave2net.com Quoting "Vasu (sB Tech Team)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's the basics of 802.11 std, when one user hogs the entire bandwidth > the remaining users have to share the bandwidth, hence bandwidth > throttling is important to ensure good and stable links to all users, I > think the XO series access point should solve your problem which can > provide dedicated bandwidth to every user. > > > > Vasu > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless > Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:02 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [smartBridges] Slow down problems > > > > Okay I think I have figured out the problem with my system. It seems > that when users are one (close users) they are associated to the APPO at > 5.5 to 11 megs possibly and the users that are further away are at 1 meg > max well if you have the near users at 11 megs tying up the radio and > the far uses cant connect at a slower speed for a better link / speed > quality then the far users suffer? am I correct in my theory does that > make any sense? > > > > So going forward we are going to have to plan some more sites closer to > the users having issues etc Has anyone else experienced this. I cant > verify 100% that this is true due to the fact the radios don't report > what speed they are associated at? Can someone think of a way to > validate this theory?? > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin & Steve > Blazen Wireless > www.blazenwireless.com > > ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
