No kiddin'.   Cool.  What brand of 18VDC adapter are you using and where did you get it from? 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 3:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Slow download speed

 

Ahh, I swapped the power supply for an 18v one and it seems to have helped. I now seem to get around 1200 Kilobits per sec in both directions to the Internet.

 

Thanks,

Roger

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:46 PM

Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Slow download speed

 

 

Hi Roger,

 

Here are a few things you could try to adjust in order to improve the performance,

 

*   Ethernet Connection - Set to 10BaseT half duplex

*   Ethernet Cable - When planning your wiring layout, try to keep cables away from power outlets, florescent lighting fixtures, uninterruptible power supplies, and other sources of strong electromagnetic interference. Use cable tester to make sure that Ethernet cable pass the test.

   Adjust Fragmentation Threshold - The use of fragmentation can increase the reliability of frame transmissions. Because of sending smaller frames, collisions are much less likely to occur. Default value is 2346. Refer to http://www.80211-planet.com/tutorials/article.php/1468331 .

*   Adjust RTS/CTS Setting - The RTS/CTS handshaking provides positive control over the use of the shared medium. The primary reason for implementing RTS/CTS is to minimize collisions among hidden stations. This occurs when users and access points are spread out throughout the facility and you're finding a relatively high number of retransmissions occurring on the wireless LAN. Default value is 2346. Refer to http://www.80211-planet.com/tutorials/article.php/1445641 for more info.

*   Use Long preamble - The default is Long. Long Preamble is standard specification in IEEE 802.11b and allows extra time for the Digital Decoder to process the packets.

With Best Regards,

 

Vasu

sB Tech Support

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Howard
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Slow download speed

 

1200 Kilobits per sec. which is about what I'd expect if I was plugged

directly into the same switch as the T1, so upload speed seems just fine. It

probably would give 400 Kilobytes per sec. if I had a local test server to

test the throughput before the T1.

 

I'll try switching to channel 1 if the new power supply doesn't help.

 

Thanks,

Roger

 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:40 PM

Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Slow download speed

 

 

> 1200Kbit/s? or 1200 Kilobyte/s? - We get about 400 Kilobyte/s (400Kb/sec)

> throughput to our backlink. It'd be worth checking the smartbridge

> statistics, see if their is a high number of errors on the ethernet side.

> Also (I don't know if you can do this on SmartBridge AP's) you may have a

> statistic to show the number of retries the customer is experiencing -

High

> retries will equate to low throughput. If they have got a high number of

> retries, check their signal strength they get back to the AP client-->AP,

> and finally, check for local 2.4 interference.

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: "Roger Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:06 PM

> Subject: [smartBridges] Slow download speed

>

>

> > I just installed an APPO on Sunday, with 3' of LMR400 going to a Pac

> > Wireless 16dbi 90 degree horizontally polarized sector antenna. It's

100'

> > high on the side of a water tower.

> >

> > I'm seeing significantly improved signal strengths at customer sites

than

> I

> > was getting with the old 14.5dbi Maxrad on my first access point, but

> > download speeds are terrible. I'm seeing around 1200k upload speed

fairly

> > consistantly (figure my T1 is the bottleneck there) but the download

speed

> > is very variable. Anything from the test failing, or maybe 90k or

> sometimes

> > several hundred k. When I switch back to the original access point

(rotate

> > the antenna for correct polarity) the performance improves.

> >

> > Does anyone have any idea what may be causing this? I'm going to try an

> 18v

> > power supply since there is about 150' of CAT5. Any other ideas what

might

> > be causing it? I'll confirm soon whether the 18v helped.

> >

> > Thanks,

> > Roger

> >

> > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------

> > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV

> > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

> >

> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List

> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe

> smartBridges <yournickname>

> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe

> smartBridges)

> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

> >

> >

>

>

>

> ----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------

> Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV

> http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

>

> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List

> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe

smartBridges <yournickname>

> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe

smartBridges)

> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org

 

----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------

Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV

http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

 

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List

To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname>

To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)

Archives: http://archives.part-15.org 

Reply via email to