| ï
Ole,
I had this setup the exact
same way, however... I had the APPO(CB mode) at the NOC and the APPO(AP mode) at
the tower. I would have thought this didn't matter but it did.
Strange. Data flows both
directions so it should not matter.
===
Rick Kosick
StarLinX Internet
Service
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:35
AM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Why not to
use smartBridge...
Hi!
Hmmmm.... I have the following setup on my tower here and it
works perfectly:
NOC
(DES 3326S) <===> APPO AP mode <----> APPO CB mode
<----> Advantech 12VDC switch <---> APPO AP out to
clients
On
the <===> link i use only the two pairs needed by ethernet from the
tower and in to the NOC. At the base of the tower I
have
a battery bank and the PowerShot's connected ther to power the radios in the
tower.
I'm
not shure of why to run the PtP link in Wireless bridge mode compared to
running it in AP <-> CB mode??
I
have currently 4 of the APPO's in the tower and they all go into a separate
VLAN in the DES 3326S switch.
Best
Regards
Oleb
No luck. I downgraded to lower firmware and
nothing.
I am going to try and reset it by using the
button on PowerShot and trying from scratch. Otherwise, I have to dump the
equipment and move to something else. Way too much time spent on this
what-should-be-simple setup. It did work for about 5 mins until I tried
enabling WEP. Ever since though, nothing.
Where are you located that you have 55MPH
wind? I'm in PA and have the same problem. Trees down everywhere
:-(
Where can I get 1.4j.9? Maybe that will
do it?
===
Rick Kosick
StarLinX Internet Service
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 10:47
AM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Why not
to use smartBridge...
Hi Rick,
Turns out that I'm also having problems
getting 2 aPPOT units to bridge. At first, I was having trouble with
one of the appot to broadcast it's ssid. The other appot did not
take up the ssid changes I made to it. Whenever sniffing wirelessly,
its ssid appeared as airPointProOutdoorTOTAL. After re-flashing the
rom, rebooting, and switching from wireless bridge mode to client bridge
mode then back to wireless bridge mode, the ssid appears properly on the
second unit. (Note, that the ssid as seen from the monitor program
would always appear as the correct one. It was only from looking at
the wireless broadcast that I could see that the ssid was
incorrect.)
Well, anyway it is way too windy here today for me to
continue (55 mph winds!), so I'll take another look at it
tomorrow.
Any luck with your setup???
Sevak
On Thu,
2003-11-13 at 09:19, Rick Kosick wrote:
ï
Software: 1.6
Firmware: 1.4j.8
Both
sides.
===
Rick
Kosick
StarLinX Internet Service
----- Original Message -----
From: Sevak
Avakians
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:11
AM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Why not to use
smartBridge...
Rick, if you got the firmware off the website,
it may not be the latest. Usually sb has a beta version that
they post on this list and most of us use before it is posted to the
website.
Check the version number using simpleNMS or the
firmware upgrade utility.
Sevak
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at
09:05, Rick Kosick wrote:
ï
I
don't know the actual version number but I just downloaded it off
the website in the past few days and it is the very latest on both
sides.
This part about it bringing the switch to its
knees is VERY disturbing because a switch, by its design, should not
allow that to happen normally. I can see it happening to a
hub.
I was working on this remotely (from home) at
late hours both times and had to drive to the NOC to remedy it
because I couldn't access any machines via PC Anywhere. The whole
network crashed basically.
===
Rick Kosick
StarLinX
Internet Service
----- Original Message
-----
From: Blazen
Wireless
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 8:59
AM
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Why not to use
smartBridge...
Interesting what firmware were you using which should not
affect your switch like that just curious to
know..
----- Original Message -----
From:
Rick
Kosick
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003
5:39 AM
Subject: [smartBridges] Why not to use
smartBridge...
So far
I've come up with three good reasons to not continue to use
smartBridges but I'm open to suggestions for fixing these
problem. Pardon my frustration but I have 3 years of wireless
experience and its taking me more than 10 hours of fiddling to
get a simple Wireless Bridge to Wireless Bridge up and running
and I am sitting here with more problems than solutions right
now.
1) Last week I plugged the ethernet side of
an APPO into an APCC PNET4 ethernet surge supressor where there
where three other devices plugged in. This caused severe packet
loss on the other devices. Pinging the other devices between
each other would result in 4 out of 10 pings timeing
out.
SOLUTION: Bypass the
ethernet surge supressor.
2) Right now
I have two APPO's configured in Wireless Bridge mode (which
won't work, see #3). At my NOC side its plugged into a D-Link
DES3226 Managed Switch. If I put the APPO into Access Point
mode, it KILLS the traffic on my switch entirely to the
point where workstations and servers can barely reach each
other. As soon as I unplug the APPO's ethernet connection from
the switch, immediately everything goes back to normal. This has
happened twice now in my quest to get my wireless link
working.
SOLUTION: No idea. Maybe avoid Access
Point mode?
3) I have to
admit I did enjoy 3 minutes of Wireless Bridge mode where
everything worked as it was expected, but I got adventerous and
enabled WEP. This did not work out for some reason and now,
after disabling WEP... I cannot get the Wireless Bridge mode to
work again. I've reset to Defaults and started over, still
nothing. I simply cannot get Wirless Bridge to Wireless Bridge
mode to work at this point. I've been through the "recycling
both sides", "double checking MAC#'s", etc. You'd think that if
this was going to work at all, I would have accidentally made it
work by now.
SOLUTION: None as of
yet.
Clearly, when considering points #1 and #2 above, there
is more happening on the ethernet side of the link than just
ethernet. Something is different than a standard ethernet
connection because this radio clearly caused major packet loss
between the other devices plugged into am ethernet surge
supressor. Maybe power is leaking through from the PowerShot
device? And, its ability to completely bring a managed switch to
its knees just reassures this..
===
Rick
Kosick
StarLinX Internet Service
** This message does not contain any viruses - scanned by Elektron and Webconnect virusscanner **
|
** This message does not contain any viruses - scanned by Elektron and Webconnect virusscanner **
|
|
