On 17 Jun 2015 at 15:36:13, Paul Sture ([email protected]) wrote:
On 17 Jun 2015, at 14:03, Perttu wrote: 

> On 17 Jun 2015 at 14:43:27, Paul Sture ([email protected]) wrote: 
>> In an office environment where the majority of files are docx, 
>> xlsx,  
>> pptx or their equivalents in non-MS Office products, they are 
>> already  
>> compressed, so there's little point in applying compression at the 
>> file  
>> level. This is easily demonstrated via "unzip -l" on one of those  
>> files.  
>> 
>> File fragmentation is also an issue (I'm thinking of Windows here). 
>> If  
>> the guest system is unaware that its files are on a host system, 
>> there  
>> may well be a substantial CPU overhead dealing with what it thinks 
>> are  
>> fragmented files because; it's not just a matter of disk head 
>> movement,  
>> the guest OS has to handle the mapping to all those file 
>> fragments.  
> 
> Do you mean that Windows might do automatic reordering on the fly if 
> it 
> thinks files are too fragmented? 

No, I'm thinking of the fragmentation itself, which occurs naturally in 
Windows as files are created and deleted. Windows has to manage the 
fact 
that files are fragmented and that can be CPU intensive. This is a 
little 
known overhead on top of the physical disk head movement associated with 
file 
fragmentation on traditional disks. 

I'd better explain where I'm coming from here. Back in the day I was 
using 
VMS, and that has monitoring tools which show the amount of CPU involved 
in mapping to fragmented files. That mapping happens in kernel mode, 
which has 
the highest priority, so an unprivileged user working with badly 
fragmented 
files could severely affect performance for everyone else. 

Yes CPUs are a lot faster nowadays so it should be less of an issue, but 
it's still something to be aware of. 

FWIW I have Windows 8.1 running under VMware Fusion and that will try to 
expand the sparse disk image its running in to its full extent each time 
I fire it up (VMware Fusion has a facility for reclaiming that space, 
which I do run to save disk space). I haven't seen this issue with 
and of the Windows Server variants I've run. 


-- 
Paul Sture 
Thanks, that’s good to know. I’m planning on running Windows 7 as a guest to 
reduce OS costs for light services that don’t need any Windows Server 
functionality.

-Perttu


-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to