Hello. On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 15:21, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: > Am Friday 30 January 2009 14:55:18 schrieb Stefan Schmidt: > > Hello. > > > > On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:26, Luca Capello wrote: > > > This basically is a continuum of the discussion started at [1]. I cc:ed > > > the smartphones-kernel mailing list, since I guess that is the correct > > > place for such kind of questions. > > > > Honestly I don't know which focus was planned for smartphone-kernel. If it > > is about problems with the specific kernel port and FSO I think the list of > > the active kernel work would be better. > > The idea was to have a list where general issues regarding > userland/kernelspace interfaces could be discussed, i.e. > > sysfs, ioctls, kobject, netlink, ... > > to find out about best practices, getting input from both sides of > the 'fence', to eventually streamline userland/kernel space interaction. > > Perhaps lkml is a better forum for that, but I doubt too many userland guys > are listening there.
Well, if we really get much userspace guys there it is still the question what they should do without kernel guys. ;) I've just seen to many lists where general kernel problems where discussed for embedded, implemented but never merged mainline as real discussion was missing. Look at some stuff handheld did. Good ideas, but often only in their own kernel tree. Anyway, I'm subscribed now and will see what will come there. regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ Smartphones-kernel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-kernel
