Am Montag 21 September 2009 21:04:54 schrieb Heiko Stübner: > To recap, the following methods not declared correctly in libfso-glib and > the compiler warns about "implicit declarations": > - free_smartphone_resource_dbus_proxy_new > - free_smartphone_resource_enable > - free_smartphone_resource_disable > - free_smartphone_resource_suspens > - free_smartphone_resource_resume > > When compiling libfso-glib I see these functions as prototypes in > freesmartphone.c but not in freesmartphone.h which is included when > compiling fsousaged and should therefore contain the function prototypes. when I port the relevant functions as prototypes to freesmartphone.h as
FreeSmartphoneResource* free_smartphone_resource_dbus_proxy_new (DBusGConnection* connection, const char* name, const char* path); void free_smartphone_resource_enable (FreeSmartphoneResource* self, GAsyncReadyCallback _callback_, gpointer _user_data_); void free_smartphone_resource_disable (FreeSmartphoneResource* self, GAsyncReadyCallback _callback_, gpointer _user_data_); void free_smartphone_resource_suspend (FreeSmartphoneResource* self, GAsyncReadyCallback _callback_, gpointer _user_data_); void free_smartphone_resource_resume (FreeSmartphoneResource* self, GAsyncReadyCallback _callback_, gpointer _user_data_); and compile fso-usaged with this changed freesmartphone.h file the warnings about implicit declared functions disappears. Shouldn't these prototypes be included by default in freesmartphone.h or is this a vala-bug? As I also saw similiar messages in fso-timed and these implicit declared functions that return pointers will not work on non-32bit-architectures, is there a way to fix this? Thanks Heiko _______________________________________________ Smartphones-userland mailing list Smartphones-userland@linuxtogo.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/smartphones-userland
