Hi. no takers?
Greetings Marc On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 10:27:12AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > this is from a SmokeAlert foo cleared e-mail created by smokeping > 2.0.9 (from Debian stable): > > Pattern > ------- > ==0%,>0%,*12*,>0%,*12*,>0%,*28* > > Data (old --> now) > ------------------ > loss: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, > 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 5%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, > 5%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 5%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 0% > rtt: 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, > 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, > 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, > 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms, 1ms > > The loss data row still has three >0% items, and the trailing *28* > should indicate that smokeping shouldn't care about whether the last > non-zero data point is last or not. But the alert is still raised when > the last data point is non-zero and cleared when the last data point > becomes zero again. > > In the mean time, I have modified the pattern to read > ==0%,>0%,*12*,>0%,*12*,>0%,*28*,>=0% > and we'll see whether that helps. > > What have I been doing wrong, and is my workaround the desired one? Btw, the workaround doesn't seem to work around the issue either. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 3221 2323190 _______________________________________________ smokeping-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/smokeping-users
