Hi Sebastian,

The SimpleFramework is also known, but different. I've tested it in other
projects as well and performs very very well. But, it's a low-level http
lib, so you need to write a bit more code if you use it alone.

Is your Jersey impl build on top of Simple? (As described here?
http://simpleweb.sourceforge.net) or what http server are you using?


On 29 April 2014 00:45, zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group <
smslib+noreply-apn2wqelb8yosywvp8ola5xw-yttrqoilgoqu4zvd7xubs...@googlegroups.com
> wrote:

> Hi Thanasis,
>
> I took a look into the HttpListeners.
> From a technical point, using this should be possible. But (*g*) in the
> end would incorporate re-coding quite some stuff regarding HTTP header
> handling etc.
> Is there any "advantage" of this simpleserver? More like "food for
> thoughts":
>
> I gave a a sample implementation of the Status page a try with the
> Jersey/REST approach:
>
> https://github.com/derjust/smslib/commit/97d50a9e359b16fe9101db989509efe803a6b392
> Isn't that different from the simpleserver one but provides more future
> flexibility regarding REST plus IMHO a more-known library?
> Filtering like the ACL I have also done in the SecurityFilter class in the
> same package.
>
> Yes I'm aware that REST endpoints are not usually made to return static
> resources like HTML pages - but the performance impact should be negligible.
>
> Yours,
> Sebastian
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "SMSLib Discussion Group" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/smslib/45068e1a-8a9c-4106-b530-1896e7dc21aa%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/smslib/45068e1a-8a9c-4106-b530-1896e7dc21aa%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SMSLib Discussion Group" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/smslib/CAGY2XjnOCFJ34ZmFZBFS2HEis079RPhNYNFub4ju06sq4ZKNDg%40mail.gmail.com.
  • [smslib] SMS-Relay... zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group
    • Re: [smslib] ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Thanasis
      • Re: [smsl... zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group
        • Re: [... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Thanasis Delenikas
          • R... zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group
            • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Thanasis Delenikas
              • ... zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group
                • ... SMSLib Discussion Group on behalf of Thanasis Delenikas
                • ... zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group
                • ... zeeman via SMSLib Discussion Group
    • [smslib] Re: ... Flo Steiermark via SMSLib Discussion Group

Reply via email to