Interesting. I have Parallels 4.0 on my MacPRo, but have never used it. I had problems getting it to load my Vista DVD...so eventually gave up.... I dont see how Pralleles can expect us to stump up an extra £30.00, expecially when Snow Leopard only costs £29.00!!!
btw...does v5.0 work with WIndows 7? On 29 Nov, 11:48, Chris Staples <[email protected]> wrote: > I know it costs but I have recently upgraded 2 machines to Parallels 5 > and so far have found it more stable and far better integrated with > the Mac OS (both machines on latest Mac system). I had a number of > irritating niggles using Parallels 3, nothing serious but annoying > none the less and I would recommend the upgrade as good value if you > use it every day (as I do). > > Chris > > On 29 Nov 2009, at 10:36, Rob Beattie wrote: > > > > > 2009/11/29 Phil Tomlinson <[email protected]>: > > >> I don't think that anyone else has pointed this out, but if you > >> upgrade to Snow L then your old version of Parallels (3.0) doesn't > >> work and you have to shell out £30 plus to get an upgrade. I > >> checked online and using Snow Checker before I upgraded but nowhere > >> did I see this information before I installed SL! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
