Le 31/01/2017 à 17:18, Sergio Schvezov a écrit : > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:21:41 +0100, Olivier Tilloy wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Timo Jyrinki >> <timo.jyri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Do we have a clear understanding of why this happens? Qt apps are >>>> supposed to be binary compatible against newer releases. >>>> One exception could be if the app itself is shipping some plugins, >>>> because in that case I believe that these plugins are somehow bound to a >>>> specific Qt version. >>> Yes, it seems snaps like ubuntu-terminal-app and dekko ship their on >>> Qt version which should not be the case when the platform snap is >>> used. >> This is a bit tricky: when packaging a Qt application that uses the >> platform snap, snapcraft will use ldd to crawl the app’s binaries and >> will automagically add the libraries that it depends on to the >> resulting snap (those libs are taken from the host system). > This will be disabled by default and snapcraft will error on missing libraries > unless you tell it is ok. > I'm a little bit uncomfortable with this statement for 2 reasons:
-- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
