Both raw device access and alsa access are interesting. ALSA is mediated (multiple snaps can get it) and raw device is exclusive.
Mark On 27/07/16 11:54, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2016, 19:46 -0600 schrieb Selene Scriven: >> * Jamie Strandboge <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On classic the interface provides access to the user session's >>> pulseaudio. On an all snaps system (eg, Ubuntu Core) pulseaudio >>> doesn't exist on the system and a pulseaudio snap must be >>> installed. Once installed, the interface is available for other >>> snaps to connect. >> Any idea if there are plans to allow ALSA access? Several things >> don't work (or don't work well) with Pulse running, and I find >> that a few lines in .asoundrc usually make Pulse unnecessary even >> for basic desktop purposes. > well, you dont really need alsa *access* you can ship the libs and > config in your snap (and have full control over your dependencies), what > you need is direct device access for that setup ... that way you can > also have all realtime love you can imagine without the underlying host > system interfering ... > > so instead of an alsa interface we should have an audio-device interface > that you can use more flexible... > > ciao > oli > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
