Found this on a search of Ken Tillery:
Ken Tillery and Jesse Dirkhising
From the I Want To Know department: Why has the name Ken Tillery suddenly shot to the top of my search-engine keyword list? I wrote an item back in February about Ken Tillery, and it was little-noticed in all the time since, until Monday.
Suddenly on Monday my traffic almost quadrupled, and the one reason why was Ken Tillery. From Google, from Yahoo, from far and wide they came, people looking for more information about Ken Tillery. I don't mind it, of course, and re-reading the piece I find my opinion unchanged since then, but I would like to know the reason for the sudden interest. Please, can someone tell me what happened Monday? Did Rush Limbaugh mention him on the radio? Did Bill O'Reilly mention him on television? None of the inbound traffic is coming from another web page, it's all search engines, so I'm clueless.
Ken Tillery Update
To recap, a variety of conservative
organizations have siezed on the lack of media furor over Ken Tillery's horrible
death as an example of media bias, a sort of hate-crime double-standard. If
James Byrd's death achieved international attention, why not Ken Tillery's? Some
would have you believe that it is because Ken Tillery wasn't black. I think that
those people are stretching reality to fit their own views. The two crimes were
not in any way equivalent, even without the racial factor.
A better example of a double-standard might be the case Jesse Dirkhising and Matthew Sheppard, but even then things aren't black and white. Matthew Sheppard was cruelly killed because of his lifestyle, and Jess Dirkhising was killed by people practicing that same lifestyle. Little Jesse's death was more cruel than Matthew Sheppard's, more vile in every way. Based on that, it passes the test that Ken Tillery's horrid death fails. Is is an exact mirror-image of Matthew Sheppard's murder? Maybe. The point is debatable, but it could certainly have been debated. However, there is one important factor that kept Jesse Dirkhising's murder from achieving nationwide attention. Jesse Dirhising was a little boy.
Reporting crimes involving sex and children is a dicey issue. Most news organizations have policies against such things. A bizarre policy, really, that almost enforces the concept that the victim is responsible in some way for the crimes perpretated against him or her, but still the policy lives on. Once a victim's name is known, most news organizations won't report the details of sex crimes, and that goes doubly so for minors. Overall, it's not a bad policy, but it does tend to lead to people "missing out" on stories like Jesse Dirkhising's.
By the way, I think another factor in the coverage the two stories received was the wishes of the familes involved. The Dirkhising family didn't hold a lot of press conferences or participate in media interviews. They apparently wanted to grieve for their little boy and be left alone, a very understandable reaction. The Sheppard family, on the other hand, clustered around television cameras and demanded coverage of the crime. That is also a very understandable reaction. In my view, almost any reaction to the loss of a family member is understandable, from silence to wailing to anything legal.
Bias?
Do I think that "the media" is biased? Sure! We're all
biased. It so happens that the majority of people working in network news, for
example, vote Democrat and trend liberal. The majority of people working in talk
radio, on the other hand, vote Republican and trend conservative. This isn't
intentional, it's just a reflection of views. I never think before saying
something, "Is this the proper Libertarian view?" and I'm pretty sure Dan Rather
doesn't vet his script with the DNC. He's just personally liberal and that's
reflected in his newscasts.
Most of all, people are biased toward money. Rush makes money serving as a mouthpiece for the RNC and clossing over pesky details. Dan Rather makes money mouthing homey platitudes and glossing over pesky details. Both serve their audiences reasonably well. And so it shall always be.
David L.
Ben Franklin: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt, they have more need of masters.”
-----Original Message-----Almost four years ago, that was the site of one of the most appalling crimes in living memory. There, on June 7, 1998, three white racists in a pickup truck crossed paths with a 49yearold black man named James Byrd, who was walking home from his niece’s bridal shower. The trio offered to give Byrd a ride, and after he accepted, they chained his ankles to the back of their truck and dragged him nearly three miles to his agonizing death. In the process, the victim’s head and right arm were severed from his body, the mutilated remains of which were thereafter dumped in front of a black cemetery. This grisly incident made national news; indeed all of America was riveted to the story for weeks.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 4:34 PM
To: Charles
Subject: [Sndbox] A Slaughter That No One NoticedJesse Jackson, who personally visited Mr. Byrd’s family to express his condolences, presided over Byrd’s funeral at Greater New Bethel Baptist Church in Jasper. In his eulogy, Jackson made it clear that this crime because of its racial component was of supreme national significance. "Turn a crucifixion into a resurrection," he exhorted the mourners. "There is power in the blood of innocents. [Byrd’s] innocent blood could well be the blood that changes the course of our country’s history." The implication was clear: Perhaps white America would now, at long last, condemn and strive to extinguish the ugly flame of racism that still raged in its collective heart.
Also among the notables attending the funeral were Texas state senator Rodney Ellis, Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, California congresswoman Maxine Waters, Houston mayor Lee Brown, U.S. Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater, and NAACP president Kweisi Mfume. "The lessons here should go beyond this generation," said Mfume, "to others who will come behind us, so that for once we will say in a collective voice and in a real way in this country: never again, never again."
Not surprisingly, Al Sharpton was on hand as well accompanied by Moses Stewart, the father of a young black man who had been shot to death by a white gunman in New York nearly a decade earlier. The racial symbolism of Stewart’s presence was clear. "Jasper has an opportunity to come forward and to turn race relations around before the century is over," said Sharpton at a news conference.
After the funeral, some fifteen shotguntoting black militants marched menacingly through the streets of Jasper. "We are here to say that violence and racism and hatred of the white man in America is just as American as apple and cherry pie," said the group’s leader, Khalid Muhammad.
Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson lamented that all Americans were "diminished by this act [Byrd’s murder], but from the depths of our pain, the fog of all our disbelief, we are going to emerge stronger." President Clinton called the killing an "act of evil" that was "shocking and outrageous." "Our work for racial reconciliation and . . . an end to all crimes of hatred in this country will go on," he pledged.
The editorial and oped pages of publications from coast to coast were flooded with denunciations of the abomination committed against Mr. Byrd. Many of those pieces characterized the killing as simply a branch of the vein of racism that ran deep through the bedrock of the American character. As the Reverend Floyd Flake a prominent New York minister and a former congressman wrote in the New York Post: "Anyone who simply believes that the funeral for James Byrd is the final chapter in this tragic episode does not understand the fear that still grips so many AfricanAmericans whose decadespast experiences taught them lasting lessons about ignorant racism and its very real and personal threat to them." To emphasize the pervasiveness of the problem, the ABC News website ran a headline: "Hate is Growing in America." Following was an article explaining that fully 474 separate "hate groups" existed in the United States.
Shortly after Byrd’s death, the NAACP initiated an effort to rename Jasper’s Lone Star Community Center in his honor, proposing that it be called the James Byrd, Jr. Community Center for Racial Healing. Moreover, noting that "violent hate crimes have been committed against AfricanAmericans or AfricanAmerican organizations . . . in most every region of the nation," the NAACP demanded that "the United States Attorney General appoint a racially and geographically diverse Task Force . . . to investigate, monitor and take appropriate action against hate crimes committed by [people] who have past or current allegiances to white supremacist organizations."
But where does 44yearold Ken Tillery fit into all this? Just a month ago, in the town of Jasper, three men in a car offered Tillery a ride, which he accepted only to be kidnapped and driven, against his will, to a remote location. When the terrified Tillery jumped out of the vehicle and tried to flee, the kidnappers caught up with him, beat him, and finally ran over him dragging him to his death beneath their car’s undercarriage.
Ken Tillery’s name is unfamiliar to most Americans. Though he died very near to where James Byrd had died before him, few people outside of Jasper ever heard about his gruesome slaying. No civil rights activists attended his funeral. There were no pained oped pieces lamenting his death. No prominent political figures issued public statements about the national significance of his killing. Mr. Tillery, you see, was white, and his three killers Darrell Gilbert, Blake Little, and Anthony Holmes were black. Thus his death had no political currency for those whose reputations depend upon their ability to portray themselves as crusaders for justice, ever guarding against white racism. Even though blackonwhite killings far outnumber the whiteonblack variety in this country, unfortunate people like Ken Tillery die in complete anonymity as opposed to unfortunate people like James Byrd, whose deaths are spotlighted in the national media. Should a murder victim’s skin color determine the significance of his or her death? It’s a serious question, well worth pondering.
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
