Liberal
bigotry, Louisiana politics and the New York Times
Michelle Malkin
(back
to web version) | 
Send
October 15, 2003
The condescension of The New York Times toward minority conservatives is so
thick, you need a Cuisinart electric carving knife to slice it. On Oct. 12, Times editorial writer Adam Cohen penned a hit piece masquerading
as a profile of Bobby Jindal, the remarkable Republican gubernatorial candidate
in Louisiana. Cohen began by noting that while Jindal's primary night victory
celebration the previous weekend was attended by a diverse mix of whites and
Indian-Americans, "there was scarcely a black reveler there." How many "black revelers" were in attendance at Democratic rival Kathleen
Blanco's election night gathering, Cohen did not see fit to print. Cohen sneered at Jindal's "almost freakishly impressive resume." At 32, the
GOP Rhodes Scholar has already turned around Louisiana's bankrupt Medicaid
program as secretary of the state's Department of Health and Hospitals; raised
graduation rates, retention and private donations as president of the University
of Louisiana system; and served as a senior health policy adviser in the Bush
administration. If a young, minority Democrat candidate possessed such a striking record,
Cohen almost assuredly would have described it as "extraordinary" or
"prodigious." But since the resume belongs to a conservative who happens to be
pro-life, pro-school choice, pro-gun rights and pro-free market, "freakish" is
what came to Cohen's narrow mind. None of Jindal's policy accomplishments matters more to Cohen, however, than
this: He is "the dark-skinned son of immigrants from India." Dark-skinned. It wallops you in the head like the high fastballs being
pitched at Fenway Park. Dark-skinned. I have met Jindal a few times over the
years; he was an Oxford classmate of my husband's. Jindal has a memorable smile,
a trademark, fast-paced way of talking, and a boundless enthusiasm about
politics and policy. Never did the hue of his skin ever register in my head.
(And yet we conservatives are constantly slimed by the media as the bigots!) I searched Nexis for any reference to Jindal's opponent's skin in the Times
and the rest of the media. Grand total: zero. There were, however, three other
references to Jindal as "dark-skinned." One appeared in a front-page, Oct. 3 Los
Angeles Times article by Scott Gold. Two were from Associated Press
reporter-turned-color analyst Adam Nossiter, who described Jindal on Sept. 28 as
"moderately dark-skinned" and just plain "dark-skinned" on Sept. 3. Maybe it was
the lighting? Liberal bigotry subsists on the oxygen of sanctimony. Thus, Cohen informed us
that it is not he who is racist, but the entire South, which has been
"historically fixated on blacks and whites, (and) has had trouble knowing what
to make of people who are neither." Mr. Cohen, can you spell "projection"? Cohen
then cited a Supreme Court case from 1927 about a Chinese girl in Mississippi
who was compelled to attend a "colored" school rather than a white one. If Cohen wanted to write about 21st-century racism in Louisiana politics, he
might have mentioned the ignorant attack on Jindal penned earlier this month by
College Democrats of America president Ashley Bell. The race-baiter-in-training
sent out an e-mail deriding Jindal as an "Arab American and the Republicans
(sic) token attempt to mend bridges long burnt with the Arab American
community." So full of hate she can't even get her facts straight. Cohen ignored the Dems' demagoguery. Instead, he attacked Jindal for
"scarcely address(ing) the special problems of Louisiana blacks" -- failing
schools, government corruption and affordable health care apparently being
"white" problems only. Cohen suggested that black gubernatorial candidates have
lost in Louisiana because white voters remain racist, but that if the
"dark-skinned" Jindal wins, it won't be because white voters are now
color-blind, but because Jindal is a politically white, "hollow symbol" of
inclusion. "If the Republican Party really wants to be inclusive, in Louisiana and
nationally," Cohen smugly concluded, "it needs to start finding nonwhite
candidates that nonwhites want to vote for." Such chutzpah the Times has to preach to the rest of us about racial
inclusion! For a look at whom the pasty-faced Mr. Cohen parties with every
morning, check out the photos of all but one of the 15 ghost-toned,
porcelain-skinned and moderately marshmallow-colored Times editorial board
members at http://www.nytimes.com/ref/opinion/editorial-board.html. To quote Mr. Cohen, there's scarcely a black reveler there.
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
