Hey I was going by the article the
Rev sent in, the one before this one. According to them it's a horror movie
staple. ROFL
Oh just shoot me....cough..... ( The oh just shoot me, was because you told me not to cough
ROFL )
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 9:04
PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Movie Reviews: 'The
Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
Nobody got their clothes ripped off really, lol.
She did walk around in a white t-shirt tied up so
it was showing her stomach, if that interests you.
And dont cough, lol.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 3:51
PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Movie Reviews:
'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
The Rev thinks she is too lol
:P
So she wasn't the one that got
her clothes ripped off then huh? lol
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 8:32
PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Movie Reviews:
'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
I told Alex someone on this list thought she
was a hot thing. I also told him it was probably you cause of the younger
age. Lol.
She was basicly the tough heroine girl in it.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 3:26
PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Movie
Reviews: 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
So was Jessica Biel a bad
girl? lol
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003
8:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Movie
Reviews: 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
We saw that last night. It was
cool.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, October 18,
2003 1:13 PM
Subject: [Sndbox] Movie
Reviews: 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
Movie
Reviews: 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre'
![image](jpg00312.jpg) Critics are attempting to
massacre the new version of The Texas Chainsaw
Massacre. But most box-office analysts doubt that they'll
succeed. Indeed, many are predicting it will not only kill Kill Bill, last
week's winner, but everything else at the megaplex this week. That
hasn't stopped reviewers from taking their best shots at the film.
Roger Ebert in the
Chicago Sun-Times calls it "a contemptible film: Vile, ugly
and brutal. There is not a shred of a reason to see it." To Lou
Lumenick in the New York Post, it's "a splatterfest remake
that relentlessly assaults the senses and mind with no discernible
redeeming social value." Dave Kehr in the New York Times says
that the movie is devoid of thrills and suspense and amounts to "a
long march to the slaughterhouse that seems to take forever to get
going and, once it does, goes nowhere that hasn't been visited
before by more talented filmmakers." Ebert, by the way, remarks that
"those who defend it will have to dance through mental hoops of
their own devising, defining its meanness and despair as 'style' or
'vision' or 'a commentary on our world.'" No such defense is
included in any of today's reviews.
________________________________
Changes to your
subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your
subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your
subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your
subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your subscription
(unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
|