'Master' and 'slave' computer labels unacceptable, officials say
Wednesday, November 26, 2003 Posted: 3:24 PM EST
(2024 GMT)
|
Story Tools
YOUR E-MAIL ALERTS |
Los Angeles (California) |
|
Corporate
Law |
|
|
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) -- Los Angeles officials have asked that manufacturers,
suppliers and contractors stop using the terms "master" and "slave" on
computer equipment, saying such terms are unacceptable and offensive.
The request -- which has some suppliers furious and others busy re-labeling
components -- came after an unidentified worker spotted a videotape machine
carrying devices labeled "master" and "slave" and filed a discrimination
complaint with the county's Office of Affirmative Action Compliance.
In the computer industry, "master" and "slave" are used to refer to primary
and secondary hard disk drives. The terms are also used in other industries.
"Based on the cultural diversity and sensitivity of Los Angeles County,
this is not an acceptable identification label," Joe Sandoval, division
manager of purchasing and contract services, said in a memo sent to County
vendors.
"We would request that each manufacturer, supplier and contractor review,
identify and remove/change any identification or labeling of equipment
components that could be interpreted as discriminatory or offensive in
nature," Sandoval said in the memo, which was distributed last week and made
available to Reuters.
The memo did not include any suggestions for alternative labels.
Dennis Tafoya, director of the affirmative action office, said in a
separate memo that an "exhaustive search" had been undertaken to find all such
labels and replace them with more "appropriate" ones. A form was sent to all
departments to identify equipment carrying the labels "master" and "slave" or
any other offensive terms.
Faced with an avalanche of complaints from vendors and the general public,
Sandoval told Reuters in an interview that his memo was intended as "nothing
more than a request" and not an ultimatum or policy change.
"I do understand that this term has been an industry standard for years and
years and this is nothing more than a plea to vendors to see what they can
do," he said. "It appears that some folks have taken this a little too
literally."
Sandoval said that he had already rejected a suggestion that the county
stop buying all equipment carrying the "master" and "slave" labels and had no
intention of enforcing a ban on such terms with suppliers.
"But we are culturally sensitive and we have 90,000 employees," he said.
"We have to take these things seriously."
Sandoval added that in addition to the e-mails he's received "telling me
how stupid I am and how I should be fired" he has gotten a positive response
from some companies willing to reexamine their labels.
In June, the Los Angeles city council unanimously passed a law requiring
that any companies doing business with the city disclose profits they may have
made from slavery in the 19th Century. In 2000, the council supported federal
legislation seeking reparations for descendants of slaves.