> When you run it without & what happens? The same thing occurs...99% CPU utilization.
> Did it create a mysnfrname.log file? What is in it? No, it didn't create a log file. But as soon as I kill the persistent process, the non-persistent one runs fine and creates the log... and there are no errors in the log. > When the instance is running do you see a .SVR file in . ? Yes, that file does get created. > Are you scanning messages in ./ also? (you should run the persistent > instance in the same directory and with the same permissions as the > message scanning instances. I'm running from the same directory and as the same user as I did with version 2-2.2. I'll send you a few more details off list, since it contains my rule name and auth code. Bill -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 8:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sniffer] v2-3 persistent and Linux At 06:16 PM 5/22/2004, you wrote: >Running v2.3 in Linux as follows causes Sniffer to consume 99% CPU >indefinitely. Is anybody else seeing this? > > ./mysnfrname.exe myauthcode persistent & When you run it without & what happens? Did it creat a mysnfrname.log file? What is in it? When the instance is running do you see a .SVR file in . ? This is highly unusual. The program _should_ sleep most of the time unless it is processing jobs. If it encouters a critical error it _should_ exit. Are you scanning messages in ./ also? (you should run the persistent instance in the same directory and with the same permissions as the message scanning instances. Hope this helps, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
