On Thursday, September 2, 2004, 2:53:08 PM, Darrell wrote: DL> Pete,
DL> How does this graph differentiate between Ham and Spam? Can't some Ham be DL> uncaught spam? And some messages identified as SPAM really be Ham? Yes, this is true - but our system is very accurate so the data is good enough for showing general trends and for developing "ball-park" numbers. For example - it's now easy to see when the ham and spam volumes increase or decrease, and how these volumes relate to eachother. There are some clear patterns visible, and there are opportunities to spot any radical changes that might occur. It's not as easy to see these things by looking at the numbers. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
