On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 7:20:24 AM, cespears wrote:

c> I started getting a large Number of  files in my sniffer dir that end in
c> .FIN ( like a thousand a day) a few that end in .ABT ( may be 12) and one
c> .LOCK File. They never seem to go away.

Any of these files that are more than a few minutes old should be
deleted. When running in peer-server mode (the default) each instance
will sense how busy the system is by counting the files in the working
directory... Everything slows down when more files are present.

c> I normaly saw a few, but they dissapere by them self after a few seconds.
c> These seem to be in large groups with time stamp in a small window of time.
c> like 7:00 am then hours go by then more 12:58 and so on..???? 

This is happening when some event interrupts the normal operation of
the system. From the spacing this might be due to a rulebase update
(if not handled properly) or it could be some other event on your
system that has a profound effect on CPU or I/O availability.

You should find some indication of this event in your SNF log files -
either a small group of errors, or a stretch of extremely long setup
and/or processing times.

Please take a moment to stop your server and sniffer then clean out
all of the .FIN, .ABT, .SVR, .QUE, .WRK, and .FIN files that have been
orphaned.

Be sure you are running the latest version of SNF (V2-3.2). There were
some recent changes in the timing functions that will make the system
more resilient.

It seems that you are probably not running a persistent instance of
SNF since these issues almost never arise when a persistent instance
is running. I recommend that you do run a persistent instance of SNF
if you are not already.

The newest version uses a .stat file to synchronize client instances
to the persistent instance for optimum performance. This new mechanism
is generally able to handle large spikes in system loads that might
previously have caused a catastrophic failure --- so I'm pretty sure
it should be able to resolve whatever is happening on your system at
0700 and 1258 etc.

If it turns out that these are rulebase update times then please be
sure that you are handling the final swap of the rulebase file using a
pair of rename operations since this minimizes the time that the
rulebase file will be unavailable.

Hope this helps,
_M




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Reply via email to