On Wednesday, January 5, 2005, 1:22:29 AM, Landry wrote:
LW> Yep, just checked mine rulebase too, went from 17mb to just under 25mb. LW> Things still appear to be functioning okay. The effect is as if we tuned the rulebase to allow almost all rules in... like setting the rule strength threshold to 0.1 (or less). Everyting should work fine - maybe even catch one or two more spam. I've found a trick with the internal data that might have caused the problem and I'm running an experiment. If my experiment works then I may be able to re-enable some of the new tuning functions right away. I will keep the list posted, of course. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
