>>Also, perhaps I am misunderstanding the data, but SNIFFER has a SQ of >>.802 - isn't that relatively "bad" ?
Most people do not have single tests that mark the message as spam. Sniffer has the tendancy to hit on messages where others tests do not. So for example on my system Sniffer may hit and mark the messgae with a weight of 8 and we tag at 10. So in this case the message is marked per MDLP standards as "ham" when in deed the message was "spam". Sniffer is very effective... Darrell ------------------------------------------- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail Queue Monitoring, Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
