> I'm on updates this evening. I'll watch for this. It sounds > like something that requires an abstract rule --- probably > not enough content for the other coders to try it safely... I > am surprized I didn't hear about it though... > > Please send me another note with a few of these as > attachments (even better if they are raw files from your mail > queue - that way there will be no re-coding by any mail > clients) -- send to our support@ address. If they get through > then that means we're not filtering them yet -- I'll use them > as examples and will try to code a complex rule that's safe. > > Thanks! > > _M >
Sure thing, Pete. I think the formatting survived ok, and even took the time to review the submission guideline on your support web page. It looks like Tito's submission survived intact, but I'll send a follow up as per your request, it's dead easy (but will include my standard Declude headers). Andrew 8) This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
