Yes, something is going on weird in Mdaemon. The strange thing is I got
both copies of your message, the one to me direct and the one to the sniffer
list. The strange thing is the one Pete sent to the list I had to pull out
of the bad message directory as it did not make it to me. I'm not sure what
the difference is.
I also found I get the following errors in the Mdaemon log for these
messages:
Fri 2005-08-19 11:10:33: Error parsing
<C:\MDaemon\Queues\Local\pd50000017032.msg>
Fri 2005-08-19 11:10:33: Message moved to
<c:\mdaemon\queues\bad\pd50000001091.msg>
Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alberto Santoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <sniffer@SortMonster.com>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after
switching to Mdaemon
Hello
I received messages of this kind me too. Then I must understand that the
cause is MDaemon and not iMail?
Alberto
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: venerdì 19 agosto 2005 20.03
To: Jim Matuska
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Headers showing up in message body after switching
to Mdaemon
On Friday, August 19, 2005, 12:53:39 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> Pete,
JM> The switch in question was from Imail to Mdaemon, so far so
I was almost hoping this was a switch to a new version of MDaemon
since this seems to be a new phenomena. Thanks for the data!
JM> good other than a few misc bugs, I like the Mdaemon Sniffer
JM> integration much better than the declude integration.
We're hoping to go this route with other systems too-- but change is
slow. The MDaemon folks are very aggressive in seeking new
improvements :-)
<snip/>
JM> Also Pete for some reason your message to the list got stuck
JM> in the bad message queue but I recieved my original post to the
JM> list. Any thoughts? Please cc: me direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] if
JM> you can so I don't have to read the response from my bad message
JM> queue when it comes from the list.
Can you check the headers for the SNF results and any other tests
which might have cause the message to get captured? There's something
there that needs to be fixed.
Thanks,
_M
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and
(un)subscription instructions go to
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
