>   This brings to mind a technique with optional adaptive 
> delay - enabled by the user. Each mail is assigned a 
> 'triplicate'

http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/
 

Andrew 8)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:43 PM
> To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
> Subject: Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through
> 
> > getting much better at what they do.  When a spammer uses Geocities 
> > links, hijacks real accounts on major providers to send 
> spam through, 
> > and changes their techniques every few hours, it makes it difficult 
> > for Sniffer to proactively block them, and the delay 
> between rulebase 
> > updates means a delay in catching things that have been tagged.
> 
>   This brings to mind a technique with optional adaptive 
> delay - enabled by the user. Each mail is assigned a 
> 'triplicate': (To_Email, From_Email, and 
> domain_of_sending_server).  Previously unknown triplicates 
> are held for a period of time before being examined for spam. 
>  The delay is long enough that SpamCop, Sniffer, and InvURIBL 
> mailtraps see copies of the spam and update the blacklists.
> 
>    This would be hard to do with the stock IMail, but 
> possibly could be done by Declude with the V3 architecture 
> and a database.
> 
>    It still doesn't provide a good answer to the problem of 
> spammers hijacking a computer and sending spam through 
> legitimate servers.
> 
> 
> This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For 
> information and (un)subscription instructions go to 
> http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
> 

This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html

Reply via email to