Re: [sniffer] Sniffer, MDLP, and invURIBL?

[Scott Fisher]

the %WEIGHT% passes the current message weight from Declude to INVURIBL. Used with SKIPWEIGHT option in invuribl.exe.config the %REMOTEIP% passes the sender's IP from Declude to INVURIBL. Used to whitelist IPs in senderipwhitelist.txt   invuribl will find false positives, but is a very effective test.   The INVURIBL weighting is determined with your setting in invuribl.exe.config   I personally use multi.surbl.org and multi.uribl.com Name servers checked against sbl.spamhaus.org URI's "A" record checked agains sbl.spamhaus.org, cn-kr.blackholes.us  and russia.blackholes.us     ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe Wolf To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 11:05 AM Subject: [sniffer] Sniffer, MDLP, and invURIBL? I'm currently running Sniffer via Declude and use MDLP.  Great!   Since all the talk about invURIBL on the Imail list I thought I'd give it a try.  The only problem I have is that it doesn't seem to be compatible with MDLP.   invURIBL assigns its own weight to each message.  The global.cfg line is as follows: INV-URIBL external weight "X:\INVURIBL\INVURIBL.exe %WEIGHT% %REMOTEIP%" 0 0 I'm not an expert but the %WEIGHT% must pass the weight determined by invURIBL to Declude.  I don't know what the variables of the weighting system are.   I'm worried that I may start getting a bunch of false positives since MDLP can't manage the weighting of invURIBL.   Would appreciate any advice from anyone that knows more about this than I do!   Thanks, Joe