Hello Steve,
Monday, February 2, 2009, 2:31:17 PM, you wrote:
|
> |
Any plans on an eWall version? |
We may look into that -- however, eWall is a very fast, lightweight solution; SNF is easily fast enough to work during the SMTP conversation; Clam AV is decidedly not that fast. It might not be a good fit to put Clam AV in an SMTP proxy. SNF will reject most email borne malware seen within eWall.
None the less, we will look into it-- I'm sure Clam AV could be scripted into eWall-- perhaps only running on those messages that don't get rejected up-front.
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[email protected]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> Send administrative queries to <[email protected]>
