A question about using the XCI <bad> command. Assume an email passes through sniffer and does not trigger any rules, I then run it through and determine it is in fact spam. I send a <bad> command to let sniffer know the IP address had a bad event. Won't the <good> event that would occur due the spam passing through nullify the bad event? Should I post 2 bad events for each mail that is caught after sniffer?
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Pete McNeil <[email protected]>wrote: > Richard Stupek wrote: > >> Thanks for the info. Is there any diagnostic information available when a >> gbudb sync occurs? >> > You can always see the current status of GBUdb in your status.* files. If > you append these logs you can follow the state of the system through time > using pre-compiled statistics including the size of GBUdb. This can be done > with one entry per minute (status.minute) or one entry per hour > (status.hour) or both. > > In the same status log you can see when the last GBUdb condensation event > occurred. > > No other useful data is produced by a condensation run so none is recorded. > > If there is something you would like to see then please let us know and we > will consider adding features to support your request(s). > > > Best, > > _M > > > ############################################################# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list <[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]> > Send administrative queries to <[email protected]> > >
