Hey Pete, 
Is there a hook to use Sniffer in SmarterMail 6?

I just had to move to SmarterMail rather than pay over $3k to upgrade iMail to 
run on a 64bit windows box. I'm using eWall at this point for Message Sniffer 
but may retire that with iMail.

On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Pete McNeil wrote:

> Hello Sniffer Folks,
> 
> I thought I would drop you a note to let you know some things we're doing 
> behind the scenes to improve filtering accuracy and prevent false positives.
> 
> Unqualified false positive candidates:
> 
> In partnership with our larger customers we have created a new system to 
> proactively review captured messages that _might_ be unreported false 
> positives (usually they are spam, but some aren't). Through this review 
> process we are able to remove and modify pattern rules that cause occasional 
> low-level false positives that would otherwise not be reported. This system 
> is already allowing us to recode or remove dozens of rules per day to make 
> them more accurate; and to update our rule coding practices and support 
> systems to further improve our accuracy moving forward.
> 
> Real-time rule / IP conflict analysis:
> 
> Today we have completed a new false-positive early-warning system. This 
> system monitors conflicts between IP reputations and pattern rule matches 
> across the entire fleet of Message Sniffer installations in real-time. Any 
> time a pattern match is in disagreement with a source IP's reputation that 
> information is analyzed and pumped through a sophisticated collection of 
> filters and data-mining tools. The resulting analysis is displayed in 
> real-time in our spam-weather center so that our staff can respond 
> immediately (24x365) if there is any sign of a "bad rule".
> 
> Since we launched this new system and operating protocols earlier today we 
> have already had several "events" -- All of them turned out to be valid 
> anti-spam rules capturing content from bot nets that had previously sent 
> *berserkers to improve their IP reputations, or where some of the campaigns 
> in question had leaked sufficiently to produce temporary positive IP 
> reputations on some systems. This information itself is very interesting now 
> that we can see it more clearly and we are already working on ways to 
> identify these cases and reduce the leakage associated with them.
> 
> As always your comments, ideas, and suggestions are both welcome and 
> encouraged.
> 
> Best,
> 
> _M
> 
> PS: *berserkers - Blackhats sometimes send messages that are random and/or 
> carry no payload. These "berserkers", sometimes sent by accident by broken 
> bots or broken spam scripts, have the effect of improving the IP reputations 
> of the systems that send them because there is no sufficient content to 
> filter against. In addition these messages are often sent at such low rates 
> that most adaptive filtering systems fail to respond to them--- if those 
> systems were to be (conventionally) sensitized to the berserkers they would 
> also significantly increase their false-positive rates.
> 
> We call these berserkers based on the practice of old Norse warriors who, in 
> an uncontrollable state (chaotic, berserk (in a fit of madness), and with the 
> belief they are immune to weapons), would charge directly into the enemies 
> ranks fearlessly attacking anything and everything (friend or foe).
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berserker
> 
> 
> 
> #############################################################
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
> Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
> For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com>
> Send administrative queries to  <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>
> 
> 

Regards, 


Steve Guluk
SGDesign
(949) 661-9333














Reply via email to