Hi, DefaultTcpTransportMapping obviously supports variant A. B is not supported and I do not know what you need to do for B.
Best regards, Frank On 03.03.2010 15:22, Moller, Hermann (NSN - DE/Munich) wrote: > Hi, > > there are different possibilities for SNMP over TCP, which include: > > A) along RFC3430, which basically means to send the BER-encoded SNMP PDU > over a TCP connection > B) along RFC3417, using SNMP over OSI : this specifies how to use an OSI > connection-less transport service for exchange of SNMP PDUs, > and then applying RFC1006 (ISO Transport Service on top of the TCP), > yielding together "SNMP over TCP" again. > > Is it correct to say that > - the DefaultTcpTransportMapping implementation supports variant A) ? > - the DefaultTcpTransportMapping implementation does not support variant > B) ? > > If above assumptions are true, > what would be needed in order to implement a manager that can support > variant B? > > I am new to the list, so please apologize if this topic has been handled > already. > > br, Hermann > > > > _______________________________________________ > SNMP4J mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j -- AGENT++ http://www.agentpp.com http://www.snmp4j.com http://www.mibexplorer.com http://www.mibdesigner.com _______________________________________________ SNMP4J mailing list [email protected] http://lists.agentpp.org/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
