Frank/All, is there any way I can tell to SNMP4J to use different socket address for IPV4 and IPV6 ? Since its very clear that its a mix of IPV4 and IPV6, if there a way to tell, then it would be great or am I missing anything ?
Regards Prathib Kumar. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Prathib Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes frank, the object itself is not changed. > > What kind of problems do you think in JDK or in RHEL ? I searched in the > net with this error and couldnt get anything of this sort ? > > We use java 1.7.0_40 version and RHEL 5.10 > > Are you aware of any similar issues ? > > Regards > Prathib Kumar. > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Frank Fock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If the target object is not changed itself then it will be OK. >> >> Best regards, >> Frank >> >> Am 15.01.2014 22:01, schrieb Prathib Kumar: >> >> Hi Frank, >> >> Thanks for your response. I corrected the alias name. >> >> We use target object as the class member variable in our code, after we >> pass the target object to the snmp4j, it might be possible that targetObj >> might be re-initialized with the different target object for a different >> device. >> >> I think that shouldnt be a problem rite ? >> >> Regards >> Prathib Kumar. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Frank Fock <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Prathib, >>> >>> First of all, the email address of the SNMP4J mailing list is >>> [email protected] >>> >>> This might be an issue with your JDK or operating system, if >>> you do not modify the Target object while a request is being >>> processed by SNMP4J. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Frank >>> >>> >>> >>>> We are using SNMP4J 1.11.2 in our product and our product runs on >>>> RHEL 5.10. >>>> >>>> So far, we have supported only IPV4 and now we started supporting >>>> IPV6 and we are getting the following exception only when we query the IPV6 >>>> and IPV4 parallely. >>>> >>>> If we have only IPV4 devices in our product, then we dont see this >>>> issue. If we have mix of both IPV4 and IPV6, then we hit upon this issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hence I went thru the SNMP4J source code and got a question that >>>> whether sendPDU() in Snmp is thread safe ? I read the FAQ and found that it >>>> says its thread safe. >>>> >>>> Since ours is multithreaded environment, any idea what could have >>>> caused this issue ? >>>> >>>> *Exception Trace :* >>>> Caused by: org.snmp4j.MessageException:* Address family not supported >>>> by protocol* >>>> at >>>> org.snmp4j.MessageDispatcherImpl.sendPdu(MessageDispatcherImpl.java:494) >>>> at >>>> org.snmp4j.util.MultiThreadedMessageDispatcher.sendPdu(MultiThreadedMessageDispatcher.java:146) >>>> at org.snmp4j.Snmp.sendMessage(Snmp.java:1082) >>>> at org.snmp4j.Snmp.send(Snmp.java:971) >>>> at org.snmp4j.Snmp.send(Snmp.java:955) >>>> at >>>> com.cisco.xmp.snmp.sessionmgr.async.ResponseFuture.internalSend(ResponseFuture.java:103) >>>> at >>>> com.cisco.xmp.snmp.sessionmgr.async.ResponseFuture.start(ResponseFuture.java:140) >>>> >>>> Please let me know if you need any other info. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Prathib Kumar. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --- >>> AGENT++ >>> Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10 >>> 73257 Koengen, Germanyhttps://agentpp.com >>> Phone: +49 7024 8688230 >>> Fax: +49 7024 8688231 >>> >>> >> >> -- >> --- >> AGENT++ >> Maximilian-Kolbe-Str. 10 >> 73257 Koengen, Germanyhttps://agentpp.com >> Phone: +49 7024 8688230 >> Fax: +49 7024 8688231 >> >> > _______________________________________________ SNMP4J mailing list [email protected] https://s16675406.onlinehome-server.info/mailman/listinfo/snmp4j
