I use the "Sending XML as String" and it works fine for me. I haven't
encounter performance issues yet and I've tested it with 100k of data. I
guess it's the best one for interoperability since it's a simple String.
Steeve...
Michael Svoboda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/08/2001 07:23:42
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Steeve Gilbert/G_STGEORGES/CANAM_MANAC)
Subject: Re: Best way to send XML over Soap?
Does anybody can post examples to the different options:
- Sending XML as a String
- Unmarshal XML to the envelope
- Sending XML as attachement (The Apache documentation isn't very clear
to me)
Which option is best suited for interoperability?
Thanks
Michael Svoboda
Huong Phan Thu wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Have I missed any follow-up messages? Could you please let me know how
> to send XML file as attachment inside a message?
> Thanks
>
> ------------------------------------
> Huong Phan
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: Rich Catlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> |Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 11:35 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: Best way to send XML over Soap?
> |
> |
> |I am doing the same thing, this is what I have found. You can
> |send the
> |XML as a string, but if that String gets to large there can be
> |performance problems on the order of a minute or two. Sending the XML
> |in the body of the Envelope you have to unmarshall it into an envelope
> |and then you have to marshall it back to the XML on the other side,
> |which is extra work if your dealing with XML already, and it
> |can be kind
> |of tricky if your new to XML as it is not very well documented,
> |especially if you extract the body of the envelope, which should be
> |where you passed the XML. The final option is to send the XML as an
> |attachment inside a message, no marshalling and unmarshalling,
> |you don't
> |have to deal with serializing and deserializing a String, and this is
> |the one I have decided to use.
> |
> |Rich Catlett
