Re: [RCSE] Soaring Nats Entries, and speeding things up a bit

[Denny Zech]

I have a skeeter.... Danny C Williams wrote: Well it's that time of year once again. NATS is in the air and the Flowers are blooming and the blooming idiots and starting to flower..or something like that... The threads that start about all the same stuff each year have started once agian also. What class to move where which ones to eliminate and the ones to promote. We have that one down now.... Let me hurry these thread's along...lol.... What about landing tasks and how unfair they are, or of no value at all or a must have and what separates the boys from the men and so on. Then the dreaded skeg rule ban them or allow them... Dork Landing's and how to deal with that..or not... Builder of the model.... Wood VS Glass... Antennas length is legal or not.... Cost of the new models..and how this will not attract new blood to the hobby... Did I miss anything????? Vendor bashing anyone.... Dr. Danny Williams D.C. "Bad roads bring good people and good roads bring bad people" after this message I am going to go hide for awhile... :^P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Well there is always Jokers... ;-) At 02:34 PM 5/3/2006, Harry DeBoer wrote: It seams to me every year about this time someone gets a bug up their butt about the way the Nat's are run and what class's should or shouldn't be allowed? Remove the entry level class's and you can be sure of the future of our HOBBY! RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to soaring-request@airage.com. Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format