RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
One thing you have to be careful with on ground range checks is the
ground..... Having the antenna just about on the ground really reduces
range. You get a a lot more repeatable test if the models is a foot or
so off the ground. 72 is similar, But 72 and 2.4 are quite a bit
different in wave length, look at the antenna length, so things behave
differently sitting right on the ground.
- [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Craig Allen
- [RCSE] Re: 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? mithrandir
- [RCSE] Re: 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? aeajr
- [RCSE] Re: 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Robglover
- Re: [RCSE] Re: 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Mike Lachowski
- [RCSE] Re: 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Robglover
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? david . jensen
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Phil Barnes
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Jon Stone
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? B. Chan
- [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Ed Anderson
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Bill's Email
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Jack Iafret
- Re: [RCSE] 2.4 Gig JR v Futaba ??? Darwin N. Barrie