Good try Gordy, I know that is something your would do! ;-)

I don't care that he took time to post, we all post and some of use do
posts on RCgroups. 

There were 9 of us there, Oleg, Phil Paul, Adam, Jeff, Bret, Mike, Bret,
and myself, Yet the only ones recognized were what appears to be the
top.  In 25 years, Oleg, Phil, Paul, Mike will be the the old group who
no one recognizes or care about.  But if they show up will anybody
recognize them???

It is funny to see someone who was not there, who did not see the
planes, nor other competitors, report Postumously.

I have plenty of photos, and started my report.  Phil, Bruce, and others
saw the contests one way, the rest of us saw it another.

I will post in good time, but not here, rather on RC groups.

Ben may be working on LSF V, but "Been there Done" that, and I perhaps
even force Steve and John to get theirs!!

Chris





> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: I say we find Ben and Crach his throwing peg!!!!
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 9:07 pm
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: soaring@airage.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Got you Chris!  I told him to leave you off knowing it would piss you  off :-)
> In any case it wasn't who was left out of his post...its that he took the  
> time to post something at all!
> You'll note no one else did.
> Nice report Ben.
> For those of you who don't know Ben, he is one of Louisville's top  thermal 
> pilots. He's been an official Nats reporter and one of our Little Lee's  
> soaring mentors...(yeah the little guy who won the MidSouth Soaring 
> Champs...and  
> ugh!!!! is headed toward taking over DLG in the near future...and shortly  
> LSF4!
>  
> Ben is working on his LSF 5 tasks with me....and someone I count as a best  
> buddy in the hobby.
>  
> Gordy
> Asheville NC tonite..you?
>  
>  
> In a message dated 7/29/2008 11:01:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ben,
> I have never been so insulted as what you have posted  here.  Perhaps
> Jeff and Bret are just as insulted.
> I have been  flying HLG longer than you are probably old, old enough for
> me to be your  father and grandfather!
> Just so you know, there were three other US  pilots at the German Open,
> yet you never acknowledge US!!!!!!!!!!
> I  have flown HLG long before anybody ever thought about HLG contests.   I
> flew in Dave Thornburg's HLG contest, and even designed a 66" HLG for  it
> which parallels what we fly today.
> I fly HLG/DLG because it gives  me the enjoyment and independence of not
> having to wait for winch lines or  frequency control.
> Jeff Carr, Bret Carr and I supported our US group  and flew.  We may not
> be the creme of the crop that Oleg, Bruce, Paul  or Phil may  be, but we
> participate for each of our own reasons.   You make it sound like we are
> invisible to the rest of the group.  I  think you are somewhat lost.
> I design and build DLGs because I enjoy  the opportunity that they offer
> me.  Of the US group, besides Oleg who  flew his 5 year old Taboo
> designs, I was the only US guy there flying My  Own design!!!
> DLG pilots fly DLG for one basic reason, it allows each  of us to fly
> independently and to not depend on waiting for winches or any  other
> complaints from others.  I can go out and fly in the AM, Noon  hour, or
> PM, and enjoy my time hunting the elusive thermal.  Contests  are not the
> only thing that matters in this world when it comes to  flying.  Some of
> us design, others fly, but in the end we fly fly  fly!.
> In my opinion, the AMA does not know what DLG is doing for the  world of
> soaring.  TD contests will be going by the wayside.   Bruce Davidson put
> it quite plainly at the German Open to me, "why should  he travel 10
> hours, fly three or 4 flights then drive back from a TD  contest", when
> he can fly DLG, many rounds and many flights and have the  enjoyment of
> not having to just do spot landings.
> I will go to more  DLG contests than TD contests this year and I am
> perhaps giving up TD  contest entirely.  I can do the social event at
> HLG/DLG contests and  still get the technical and design satisfaction of
> DLG flying. After all  What is  DLG but a subclass of TD.  Perhaps we
> should be saying  that TD is really a subclass of HLG/DLG because we used
> to thermal out TD  ships from Hand launches when we test glided TD ships!
> Personally I see  DLG support  by the AMA replacing F3B and even perhaps
> F3J, as a world  class group.
> So I think you owe Jeff, Bret and Me an apology for not  recognizing us
> as participants at the German Open at the same level as  Oleg, Bruce,
> Paul, Phil and the rest.
> Don't forget, Bret did make  the Junior flyoffs and did place in that
> realm!
> Please come back  when you realize there are others who fly also.
> Thermals,
> Chris  Adams
> LSF 348 Lvl V (#8)
> > -------- Original Message  --------
> > Subject: [RCSE] An argument for handlaunch.
> > From: Ben  Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, July 29, 2008 7:15  pm
> > To: soaring@airage.com, LASS Soaring List
> >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So y'all have probably heard my  whining about the lack of 2 days of
> > handlaunch at the NATS, so let me  pitch you my argument for it and for
> > better attention paid to  handlaunch by soaring in general. This is the
> > product of a number of  discussions I've had with a number of people
> > involved with soaring at  different levels over the past couple of years,
> > so here goes:
> >  AN INTRODUCTION
> > I've been in soaring since 2003, and have been to the  NATS the last 4
> > years in some capacity or another. My first love is  handlaunch, but I'm
> > also a big fan of RES and Unlimited stuff. I also  got the
> > international-style bug last year towing for an F3J team at  the NATS.
> > Second, let me state that I have helped Denny Maize over the  last 3
> > years organize his Polecat Challenge. In those years, it's gone  from a
> > pretty well attended contest (40 pilots) to last year, which  had 93
> > registered and paid pilots.  Around 80 or so flew. (Yes,  we managed to
> > top the IHLGF this year, but that might just be a  statistical "wobble",
> > or it could be the Red Bull girls, pig roast or  huge soaring raffle).
> > As I was intimately involved with the  registration of the pilots and the
> > gathering and reporting of  information about that contest as well as the
> > NATS last year, I've got  a somewhat unique perspective into handlaunch
> > and soaring.  I  stress "handlaunch and soaring" there, because the
> > crossover between  HL and TD is pretty well delineated. There are a lot
> > of people doing  HL and more doing TD, but there is only modest
> > intersection between  the two.
> > SOME NUMBERS
> > At the Polecat Challenge, out of the  80-some pilots:
> > 13 of them were "Novices", meaning that they hadn't  flown a contest before.
> > 29 of them were Sportsmen.
> > The rest  were experts.
> > The average age for handlaunch competitors skews much  younger than
> > soaring in general (this is empirical)
> > Last year  at the NATS when I did the coverage for the NATSNews, I had to
> > hunt  and peck for guys who were new to soaring or the NATS - and that
> > was  out of 100+ pilots. I think I counted maybe 5 or 6 that were new to
> >  soaring or to the NATS.  Many of them were in handlaunch (I brought  at
> > least two of them with me). I'm not covering the NATS this year,  but
> > attendance is the same as last year, but with RES attendance way  up, so
> > I'm assuming things stayed the same.  Someone contradict  me on that if
> > I'm wrong.
> > I spoke with a number of the new guys  at the Polecat and a large number
> > of them had never flown sailplanes  before getting into handlaunch - but
> > they had flown some sort of R/C.  Helis, electrics, some gas, etc.
> > Handlaunch is drawing people from  other R/C niches to soaring.  That's a
> > good direction for  us.
> > WHY TWO DAYS AT THE NATS
> > Well, frankly, because when I  tell handlaunch people to "come to the
> > NATS," they all say "I would,  but only if it's a two-day contest". And I
> > swear to you I didn't put  that quote in their teeth! I will lay a $5 bet
> > that the first two-day  handlaunch contest at the NATS draws at least as
> > many pilots as  2-meter, and maybe even as many as RES. I've spoken to at
> > least that  many people - and the handlaunch community is pretty damn
> > tight -  we'll support it. Period.
> > Now, about the recent German contest - the  German Open this year (just
> > last weekend, same as NATS HL) drew away  at least a half dozen of our
> > top handlaunch pilots FROM THEIR OWN  NATIONAL COMPETITION. Oleg
> > Golovidov, Phil Barnes, Paul Anderson and  Bruce Davidson, all past IHLGF
> > or Polecat winners, didn't go to their  own NATS because there is a
> > better contest -- in Germany. 112 pilots  from all around Europe, Sweden,
> > Norway, Ukraine, etc etc. Huge. Beer  on tap *at the field*!
> > We've now got two serious and large contests -  the IHLGF and the Polecat
> > - but we don't have a "NATS" that is worth  going to, and therefore isn't
> > considered a "National" contest by  anyone in the HL community.  I don't
> > want to get into that whole  "Is the NATS a fun-fly?" argument again, but
> > I would like to make  Handlaunch at the NATS worth going to...
> > SUMMARY
> > * Handlaunch  is attracting more new pilots
> > * Handlaunch is attracting a younger  audience
> > * Handlaunch is acting as the "gateway" into soaring in  general
> > If you hold it, they will come.
> > If you bring more  handlaunchers to the NATS, you are bringing more (and
> > more young)  people into soaring.
> > If you bring more people into soaring, it is a  good thing(tm).
> > And finally - F3K is "official" now and is going to  have it's first-ever
> > World Champs in 2011. It is never early enough to  start supporting it.
> > Some of you on the RCSE have already heard this  before and I appreciate
> > you listening! I am happy to say we *are*  making progress on it.
> > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane  News.  Send "subscribe" 
> and "unsubscribe" requests to  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that 
> subscribe and unsubscribe  messages must be sent in text only format with 
> MIME 
> turned off.  Email  sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are 
> generally NOT in text  format
> RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send  "subscribe" and 
> "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Please note that 
> subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only  format with 
> MIME 
> turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as  Hotmail and AOL are 
> generally NOT in text  format
> **************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for 
> FanHouse Fantasy Football today.      
> (http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format

Reply via email to