At 04:44 AM 3/14/01 -0600, David Cole wrote:
>You may feel that you owe the merchant nothing, but I think you owe them
>fairness. And to me it seems very unfair to attempt to ruin a vendor's
>reputation FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN THAT HE FAILED TO RESPOND TO YOUR
>EMAIL WITHIN 24 HOURS,
Hopefully this whole thing is just a misunderstanding, but in his defense,
he did say that he sent several emails over the course of several weeks.
At this point, he's just waving his arms around trying to get the vendor's
attention. I agree, a small web vendor should not have to stayed tied to
the computer and monitor email on a day-to-day basis, but at least some
sort of status update over the course of several weeks is not at all
unreasonable, especially if the customer has already paid for the product.
I guess I've been lucky in dealing with sailplane equipment folks over the
internet. I've never had anyone try to rip me off or delay shipping
something after I've been charged for it with no explanation. As I said,
hopefully that's not the case here either, and it's all a big
misunderstanding.
Brett
____________________________________________________________________________
Brett Jaffee: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brett's Slope and Power Home Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~jaffee
OnTheWay Quake 2 server utility: http://www.planetquake.com/ontheway
The Unoffical Extra 300 Home Page: http://www.bayarea.net/~nathan/extra300/
____________________________________________________________________________
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
