If you actually look at the round scores you will see it is timed to the tenth of a second. What you are looking at is the "Normalised" score as a percentage to 2dp. At some point you have to draw the line. Yes Joe did get pipped, perhaps if he wore shoes? I still feel the fly off's are stupid, why not just continue the rounds dropping your worst score. Then add winches (with Mono). Enjoyed following it this week. Aneil, Auckland, NZ
-----Original Message----- From: Rick Van Clief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 10 August 2002 22:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [RCSE] FAI timing OK we're talking about hundredths here. I may be revealing gross ignorance here, but how can some guy holding a stopwatch hope to be accurate enough for hundredths of a second to be considered? RVC At 08:07 PM 8/9/02 -0700, you wrote: >OK, it appears as if we're carrying timing to the >tenth of a second for F3J. But does this mean we're >rounding the hundredths? Or truncating? OK, sorry, >don't care. I don't much keep up with F3J. We truncate >in F3B, or has this been changed also? > >Go Shoeless Joe! GO! Don't let those Canadian hockey >geeks whoop up on us! ;-) > >D > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs >http://www.hotjobs.com >RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" >and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
