Dear Bill, I can assure you there are none. If you want to prove that, just run the test we use to qualify every new receiver design: 1) Put the receiver in an airplane big enough for you to see at 2,000 ft up. That will have to be at least six foot span for the average person. Our Tim and Howie can see much better than that as the airplane always disappears from my 69 year-old sight long before he quits climbing the airplane. 2) Install any receiver you want to check 3) Pick a clear day; don't try it when foggy , cloudy, or high humidity 4) Fly the airplane to the max distance you can see it. You had best do this overhead as it is difficult to see an airplane at 2,000+ ft down low against clutter 5) Collapse the transmitter antenna (Better yet , have someone else do it as you may lose sight while doing it yourself. 6) Fly the airplane with the antenna collapsed just as you normally would. 7) Turn on at least one adjacent channel transmitter and a 3rd order interferer while doing this. 8) DON'T DO THE FOLLOWING AS WE HAVE ALREADY DONE IT WITH M5: Turn on a transmitter on the same frequency and watch the SMART decoder reject that transmitter. CAUTION: If you try this, be sure to have a helper stand by to pull the transmitter antenna to full length. All this in a package that weighs about 9 grams.
Happy flying, Fred Marks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Swingle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RCSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:15 PM Subject: RE: [RCSE] Receiver MOST Resistant to Interference? > In my search for the MOST interference resistant receiver, I decided to > throw caution to the wind and purchased an FMA M5. > > Any other worthy options that are known to be technically superior? > > Bill Swingle > Janesville, CA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]