Forums are typically divided by topic. For instance, RCU etc, have topic
(threads) for aircraft, boats, etc, and topics within topics
aircraft/sailplanes, airplanes/gas, airplanes/quarter scale, etc. It's
like Windows and all those damn directories you must traverse to get to
what you want to see. I get enough of THIS stuff just working.
RCSE on the other hand is what you might call a niche topic whose main
thrust covers thermal duration machines and, more recently, electric
soaring machines. Of course there are certainly sub-categories within TD,
but do we really need to get SO specialized that we need separate areas for
batteries, programming JRs, foamie combat, etc? Obviously not.
We who are not "into" these special sub-areas put up with posts on these
subjects (anyway) for the sake of "free speech" , and rightly so. We are
also free to openly argue, which is the right of all. Sure, when anyone can
state an opinion, (no matter how stupid) we just take it with a grain of
salt. We do put up with a lot of nonsense, stupid questions, and Gordy,
all in the same place. Imagine if you couldn't flame Sol, Etiene, Gordy or
Karlton, ...whomever: Bummer, huh?
In short, RCSE is what MOST of us are comfortable with. If you really want
to get into a forum, there are several around. Join, start a thread and
knock yourself out! But the digest version of RCSE certainly serves MY
needs as I can pick and choose and then skip over if necessary without the
penalty (in my opinion) of the imposition of a formal structure.
There's just to much structure in the world already. So, MY vote is to
leave RCSE the hell alone! I'm with you Michael! Keep the Good Thing going!
D.O.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
- Re: [RCSE] Forums, etc d. o. darnell
- Re: [RCSE] Forums, etc James V. Bacus