John You know it is funny, but the Airtronics guy's say that they wished I flew JR...Go figguer ???
Your numbers do not match up with what I was told... But the 368 has been a great servo for me and I have 368's with over 500 hours of flight time on them with in my Icon armada. I have had only had five failures sense the 368 hit the shelf's. Which is pretty darn good one broken gear and the others just quit moving from old age and abuse so I could not complain at all...not that you would listen to me anyway. Also some of these were the first 368's to hit the general market so there are always fuzzy stuff in the first few....lol The only servo that has done me as good are those darned blue thang's and the 141's... I did a weight lift test and the Airtronics could lift more than the 368 could so I just assumed that the Airtronics was stronger...MY BAD... Dr. Danny Williams Colorado Springs, CO Bad Roads bring good people, and good roads bring bad people. > Dr Dan, > You know I love you man, and I really am glad you fly Airtronics. > 8^) > You know that I'll even support other branded flyers that use JR > servos, > including you. I'm also glad that Airtronics has stepped up in the > servo department. > Not sure which "Brand X" servo DP's post was refering to, but here > are > the facts regarding the new Airtronics servo vs the JR DS368, > comparing new servo to new servo. > Torque: with 4-cell pack > Air=3D37.1 oz/in, JR=3D53 oz/in > Speed: with 4-cell pack > Air=3D.18sec/60 degrees, JR=3D.21sec/60 degrees > Size: > Air=3D.48 x 1.07 x 1.11, JR=3D.50 x 1.12 x 1.17 > Weight: > Air=3D.78oz, JR=3D.75oz > Warranty: > Air=3D?, JR 3 years > It is slightly faster and slightly smaller. > Regards, > John RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format
