A couple of comments on the woodie/moldie thread:

1) Thanks to the organizers for proposing this event. It should be great no matter what aircraft are flown. Really looking forward to this one.

2) I think when we talk about woodies or moldies we're may also be differentiating by performance types and not exclusively by material types. Differentiating by materials is an obvious way to do it at the sign-in desk. But in the air, what's really the difference? Woodies tend to be lower wing loading, minimum sink floaters while moldies tend to higher loadings with camber changing ability to hunt and then core well. Neither is 'better' in an absolute sense. They both reflect a flying style preference and that's great.

I'm also reminded that Muncie can have days of very spotty light lift. And I'm painfully reminded (frequently) that on those kind of days, planes like AVAs and Bubble Dancers leave a lot of us moldie guys in the dust.

Go for it, woodies. Nothing in the rules says they're not capable of beating anyone if the conditions are right.

- Dave R

"Flying something is a lot better than flying nothing"
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe 
messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email 
such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format

Reply via email to