On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda <callka...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda <callka...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Kalpa, >>>> >>>>> Well, since I have packages sugar-ruler successfully and there are >>>>> some more to be reviewed, I now have an understanding of the process. >>>>> And I hope that I'm in a state to co-maintain some sugar activities. >>>>> So if you wish me to co-maintain add me to them. >>>> >>>> Sorry for my tardiness on getting some more packages reviewed. I've >>>> been busy in cleaning up my Fedora 16 duties as well as various other >>>> releases. The last month has been busy! >>>> >>> >>> It's ok. Hope they will get reviewed when you are free. >> >> With luck the coming weeks. Although I've said that before... >> >>>> So you need to apply for co-maintainership of packages yourself. To do >>>> this go to the following URLs and request watchbugzilla watchcommits >>>> and commit on devel, F16, F15 >>>> >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sugar-typing-turtle >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sugar-visualmatch >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sugar-abacus >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sugar-jukebox >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/sugar-labyrinth >>>> >>>> Let me know if you have any issues or queries. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for the guidance. >>> >>> I requested the permission as you stated and waiting for the >>> permission on commit for all the packages and updates of them to >>> proceed. >> >> I've done abacus, sdz will do the rest when he awakes. >> >>> btw, since a package is maintained by more than one, how can we make >>> sure that there won't be any conflicts. For example when a new release >>> is available, if all the maintainers build and update, there is a >>> conflicts. Does the system itself warn of such conflicts or do the >>> maintainers have to have a mutual understanding on the thing? >> >> It generally shouldn't be a problem. Nothing happens until you "push" >> to central and in that case you'll get conflicts. Generally it won't >> be a problem. sdz is busy at uni and I'm quite happy to let you take >> the lead on them so basically i'll leave them to you to deal with >> unless you want help with a particular problem. >> > > that's fine > >> BTW do you have a XO laptop? >> > > unfortunately, I don't have one. Hope it has anything to do with > package maintaining although.
Nope, I might a spare or two coming up. Interested? Peter _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas